Jump to content
Explore Forums
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Bob

Question 1 Passed In Nevada

Recommended Posts

Seems the citizens of Nevada have voted in question 1, so it looks like we have to get ready for some serious changes in our firearms rights in the state, and it's clear this is only a start. Once they get a change like this, it opens the door for even more radical change in the future. I think it's the first sign that it's time for me to prepare to leave the state. I recognize the state is turning into the one I had fled. Taking a serious look at Idaho right about now. Anyone else paying attention to Question 1? Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We treat the government like an imbecile commanding an army of thugs, keep our distance and stay off that morons radar.  It's pretty easy with all the other morons around begging for scraps/handouts/etc..  We stay prepared at a level that makes sense to us, and have plans in place.

There are pockets of relative freedom even in California, hard to find but they exist.  IMO moving to another state would not be worth it, it would just be different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nevada may yet be saved - this is the point at which the tide actually CAN be turned.  In California, it's an impossibility, and comparing NV and CA is not helpful in that regard.  Also, at last count it seems Q1 won by only a few points - compare that with Prop 63 in CA which won by well over 60-40.  It just shows we have more idiots in California, and until it becomes legal to deport or kill them, there's no fixing it. 

There are pockets of freedom in CA - that is something I can personally attest to.  An example is the Lake City-Cedarville area.  It is sparsely populated, mostly by ranchers, some Indians, and a few wage-earners on the government payroll (USFS, plus some county jobs).  Everyone carries something in their car, truck, purse or belt.  The local Sheriff really *is* a local, and beyond dealing with actual crimes, doesn't go looking for "problems" to police.  People keep to their own business, but they are very hospitable and gracious.  And if they find out you're related to one of the original founding families of the area, they pretty much take a high shine to you.  They may not be discussing the finer points of Plato's Republic over a fine cognac - but that's only because these folks have real problems, real concerns, and try to find real solutions so they can get on with things.  That's about as free as California gets anymore.  Other mountain towns are similar, though not all mountain towns are like this. 

Beyond that, resist.  I do.  I refuse to comply with any number of laws and their mandates.  I encourage others to do the same, and gladly explain the stakes of doing so.  As a member of the State Bar and the Federal Bar, I openly encourage jury nullification, and routinely explain the true role of a jury to anyone who cares to know.  The recent Federal trial and acquittal of the Malheur occupiers is a prime example of jury nullification, yet I have not seen a single story in the mainstream media discuss the topic.  They are afraid to.  Why?  It necessitates a discussion about your 'peers' exercising their ability to think and reason independent of government guidance.  The government hates it when you think freely, because then you screw up their plans and thwart their aims. 

My level of planning and preparation is now set to increase.  As soon as things calm down on the home front (got stuck in port today - bad weather), I have plans to make the first of several additional preparatory moves, along with someone else here.  They are small steps, but they are positive ones, and ones that open up other possibilities. 

 

Hey Bob, do you have a link to the actual text and NRS references of Q1?  All my Googling brings me to crappy, incomplete news stories and I'm a tad short on time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://nvsos.gov/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=3440

They should have named this the 'firearms dealer subsidy'.  There's a lot of exceptions carved out, including transfers between family members (by marriage, adoption, darned near everything)... I've heard the phrase Bob's your uncle, so I guess that means I can buy/sell with Bob no problem ;-)

Just took a look at who was behind this.  Trail ends at a non-profit "Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, Inc."  Their 2014 tax return shows $40million income, over 7 million of that for salaries (about a million goes to a handful of top level folks, one guy gets $76k for 1 hour a week of work as the 'outgoing chairmen'.  'Other Expenses" about $27million.  Actual grants dispersed for their stated purpose, $3 million.  If my math is right, that's about 8 cents on the dollar actually going to the stated purpose of the non-profit.  As is typical, most if the income is hidden and no luck finding a list of sources.

They do disclose various organizations they are affiliated with, mostly democratic this and that.. The irony of these is probably lost: "Minnesota Coalition for Battered Women", "National Network to End Domestic Violence" and a pile of other 'domestic violence' pigs feeding at this trough with zero interest in actually preventing domestic violence of any sort (they've be out of a job if they did).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if there are any legal grounds for this new law to be challenged in court? I respect the will of the people, but all too often, when the roles are reversed, they always take it to the courts. I think it's time to fight fire with fire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this is a really old post but I'm still gonna comment on it the only reason question 1 passed was because of all the nut job city people. Unfortunately it seems the only countys that have any say when it comes to any type of voting on any thing is clark and Washoe county every other county has no say. It seems unfortunately all the dumbass city people get to choose everything that happens in the state of Nevada. An example of this is the 2017 election every county but  Clark and washoe voted for Trump but since clark and washoe are more populated they are the only ones who had any type of say. I already understand that city ppl are basically living pieces of trash but I mean does living in the city make people lose brain cells or something ?? because it seems that with judging by all the uninformed and very confused liberals living in citys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/18/2018 at 4:51 AM, braindead0 said:

It's what you get with democracy, mod rule writ large.

The surest way to depose liberty is to elevate democracy.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, proper explorations said:

It should be more of a electoral vote situation going on with each county just like they do with states

Off the top of my head (I haven't done the math), but I think even better would be to use the Maine/Nebraska system in place for presidential electoral college votes.

They go by congressional district.  That could easily work out into NV state senate and assembly districts.  So a red district in a blue county (or most of a blue county, depending on how districts are drawn) has a voice. 

Just by comparison, Trump took almost 33% of the vote in California for 2016.  But Clinton took all 55 EC votes because we're "winner take all".  That would have reduced her electoral college take AND reduced her popular vote take (which is a stupid argument anyway, for the same reasons we're having this discussion to start with).  Even if the election had gone a different way, it would truly be more representative.  The 'winner take all' method represents the mob, nothing more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, desertdog said:

Off the top of my head (I haven't done the math), but I think even better would be to use the Maine/Nebraska system in place for presidential electoral college votes.

They go by congressional district.  That could easily work out into NV state senate and assembly districts.  So a red district in a blue county (or most of a blue county, depending on how districts are drawn) has a voice. 

Just by comparison, Trump took almost 33% of the vote in California for 2016.  But Clinton took all 55 EC votes because we're "winner take all".  That would have reduced her electoral college take AND reduced her popular vote take (which is a stupid argument anyway, for the same reasons we're having this discussion to start with).  Even if the election had gone a different way, it would truly be more representative.  The 'winner take all' method represents the mob, nothing more. 

this is an explore forum so I don't  want to start a bunch of arguing but that's my opinion on the electoral vote situation.  And If your saying they should make it where population votes for presidents etc in the US. California would basically decide everything for this country because they have the most population. that doesn't sound very fair to you does it ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, proper explorations said:

this is an explore forum so I don't  want to start a bunch of arguing but that's my opinion on the electoral vote situation.  And If your saying they should make it where population votes for presidents etc in the US. California would basically decide everything for this country because they have the most population. that doesn't sound very fair to you does it ?

No, that's not what I'm saying at all.  I'm saying get rid of winner-take-all EC situations.  Winner-take-all specifically disregards a large chunk of the population that doesn't agree with some other large chunk of the population.  Right now CA gives its EC votes by winner-take-all.  Which means if Trump took 40% of the vote and Hillary to 60% in CA, Hillary would get 100% of EC votes.  That's effectively popular vote.  If Trump won 40% of CA's EC votes and Hillary only won 60% of CA's EC votes, then you split them accordingly.  Since any one EC vote is equal to any other EC vote you actually better represent a state's choice(s) that way. 

Winner-take-all is actually closer to decision by popular vote than the method I'm suggesting, and it would tend to decrease populous state influence, not increase it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 339 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • Our picks

    • This is the location of the famous Mojave Phone Booth. Unfortunately not much is left today, but it's still a cool location to visit with an interesting history. 
      • 1 reply
    • South Pass City WY
      South Pass City, approximately 90 miles north of Rock Springs, is a historic site administered by the state of Wyoming.  It consists of over 30 log, frame, and stone buildings, along with the Carissa Mine and Stamp Mill.



      South Pass City Historic Site
      • 11 images
    • Surprise Canyon, California
      Recently, I’ve been going through my old VHS video tapes and digitizing them to DVDs.  These tapes contain my travels and explorations between 1995 and 2009.  I thought I’d start releasing some video shorts of my early travels on this forum.

      The back story for this particular video is as follows.  On March 30, 1996, I made a short hike of about a mile and a third up the lower third of Surprise Canyon, on the western slopes of the Panamint Range, Inyo County, California.  This canyon is just outside of Death Valley National Park.  This canyon has running water running year round through the stretch shown, fed by substantial Limekiln Springs, and the canyon is a water wonderland.  For those not familiar with the area, refer to the two maps.  The first one shows the canyon in relation to the region, the other a close up of the canyon and the ghost town of Panamint City.  The blue line in the close up image shows the route that was taken.

      • 24 replies
    • Exploration Field Trips - March 31-April 2, 2000 - Into the Nevada Triangle with Lew Shorb
      My next series of videos will be based on a trip in 2000 that I took with Lew Shorb.  Lew is a board member here, as well as owner of the popular website http://www.ghosttownexplorers.org/ghost.htm

      In breaking with my past habit of culling out historical sites and ghost towns and creating short videos dealing with these, I decided to keep the exploring part of Explore Forums in and create videos of each day of my travel and exploration, including our camps.  Scenery, travel, camping ghost towns and wide open spaces.

      Part one of this series, as well as subsequent videos, will all appear here within this same thread. Part I will start in my garage, where I was finishing up with the packing my truck.  The following day, after work, I begin my travels to meet Lew Shorb at Rhyolite, Nevada ghost town.

      Our three day, two night travels prowled about the "Nevada Triangle" section of northeastern Death Valley National Park; and will include such sites as:

      1. The Las Vegas & Tonopah Railroad
      2. Gold Bar
      3. Phinney Mine
      4. Strozzi Ranch
      5. Currie Well (LV&T RR)
      6. Mud Springs Summit (LV&T RR)
      7. Happy Hooligan Mine


      This video, that of March 30th and 31st, will start off this series; and is brief, only being 3:28 long.  Nevada-Triangle_Shorb-2000_Part-1.wmv

      So, below is my narrative of part one of this series to give full context of what is seen in the video.  It will probably take longer to read than the video is long.

      --------------------------


       
      • 9 replies
    • Exploration Field Trips: May 1-3, 2000 - Trip with Alan Patera and Alan Hensher into Death Valley
      Exploration Field Trips:
      May 1-3, 2000
      Trip with Alan Patera and Alan Hensher into Death Valley

      What do you do with three authors, two 4x4’s, two two-way radios, three cameras, and camping supplies? Send them to Death Valley, of course. For three days in the first week of May, 2000, fellow authors and historical researchers Alan Patera, Alan Hensher and myself explored Death Valley north and south.

      Alan Patera writes and publishes the WESTERN PLACES series of monograph books.  Alan Hensher has been published in several periodicals as well as authoring several books, centering primarily on the history of Mojave Desert sites.

      Alan Patera, who hails from Oregon, came south to California and picked up Alan Hensher; then the two came my way. At the time I was living in Ridgecrest, California. After overnighting with my wife and I, the three of us took off for Death Valley.  Alan was busy researching and photographing for a future edition of WESTERN PLACES, this time centering on the camps of the Funeral Range, which forms the eastern border of east central Death Valley.  Circumstances and changes of our journey lead Alan to plant the seeds of two more future books, this time centering just outside the northernmost section of Death Valley.




       

       
      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...